UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrantx

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

500 HILLS DRIVE

BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY 07921

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018

To Our Shareholders:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (the “Company”) will be held on the first floor of our headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey on Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. local time, to consider and vote:

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 16,15, 2018 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

You are urged to read carefully the attached proxy statement relating to the meeting.

Shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, we urge you to exercise your right to vote as promptly as possible.

Bedminster, New Jersey

March 27, 2018

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED

OR VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR

THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 9, 2018

This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at

http://www.edocumentview.com/PGC

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Table of Contents

PEAPACK-GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

500 HILLS DRIVE

BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY 07921

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement is furnished to the shareholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (“Peapack-Gladstone” or the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on the first floor of our headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey on Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. local time. This proxy statement is first being made available to shareholders on approximately March 27, 2018.

VOTING INFORMATION

Outstanding Securities and Voting Rights

The record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting is March 16,15, 2018. Only shareholders of record as of the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

On the record date 18,946,56419,013,821 shares of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock, no par value, were outstanding and eligible to be voted at the meeting. Each share of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock is entitled to one vote.

Delivery of Proxy Materials

The 2018 notice of annual meeting of shareholders, this proxy statement, the Company’s 2017 annual report on Form 10-K and the proxy card or voting instruction form are referred to as our “proxy materials.” Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are furnishing our proxy materials to certain shareholders over the Internet. Most shareholders are receiving by mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (an “E-Proxy Notice”), which provides general information about the annual meeting, the matters to be voted on at the annual meeting, the website where our proxy statement and annual report are available for review, downloading and printing, and instructions on how to submit proxy votes. The E-Proxy Notice also provides instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials and how to elect to receive either a paper copy or an electronic copy of the proxy materials for future meetings.

Shareholders that have previously elected to receive proxy materials via electronic delivery will receive an e-mail with the proxy statement, annual report and instructions on how to vote. Shareholders who previously elected to receive paper copies of the proxy materials will receive the proxy statement, annual report and instructions on how to vote by mail.

Householding

When more than one holder of our common stock shares the same address, we may deliver only one E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to that address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of those shareholders. Similarly, brokers and other intermediaries holding shares of our common stock in “street name” for more than one beneficial owner with the same address may deliver only one E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to that address if they have received consent from the beneficial owners of the stock.

We will deliver promptly upon written demand or oral request a separate copy of the E-Proxy Notice or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to any shareholder or record at a shared address to which a single copy of those documents was delivered. To receive additional copies, you may write to or call Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 or (908) 443-5386. If your shares are held in “street name,” you should contact the broker or other intermediary who holds the shares on your behalf to request an additional copy of the E-Proxy Notice or proxy materials.

If you are a shareholder of record and are either receiving multiple E-Proxy Notices or multiple paper copies of the proxy materials, as applicable, and wish to request future delivery of a single copy or are receiving a single E-Proxy Notice or copy of the proxy materials, as applicable, and wish to request future delivery of multiple copies, please contact Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary at the address or telephone number above. If your shares are held in “street name,” you should contact the broker or other intermediary who holds the shares on your behalf.

Required Vote

The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the shares entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted to determine a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial holder does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary power to vote with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

The election of directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock voted at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. This means that the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the election of directors.

The approval of each of (1) the amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, (2) on a non-binding basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and (3) the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, whether voted in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the approval of these proposals.

All shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will be voted as follows, unless the shareholder specifies a different choice by means of the proxy or revokes the proxy prior to the time it is exercised:

Should any other matter properly come before the meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote upon such matters in their discretion.

Voting

We are offering you four alternative ways to vote your shares:

Internet. If you wish to vote using the Internet, you can access the webpage at www.envisionreports.com/PGC and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code on your E-Proxy Notice or proxy card with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the webpage.

Telephone. If you wish to vote by telephone, call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE(8683) and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.

Mail. If you wish to vote by mail, please sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

In Person. The method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote in person at the meeting if you decide to attend in person. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. If you submit a proxy and then wish to change or vote in person at the meeting, you will need to revoke the proxy that you have submitted, as described below.

Revocability of Proxy

Any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to attend and to vote at the meeting in person. A proxy may be revoked prior to the meeting by submitting a later-dated proxy or a written revocation to Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary, Peapack-Gladstone, at 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey, 07921. A proxy may be revoked at the meeting by filing a later-dated proxy or a written revocation with the Secretary of the meeting prior to the voting of such proxy or by voting in person at the meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy solicitation is being made by the Board of Peapack-Gladstone and the costs of the solicitation will be borne by Peapack-Gladstone. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, e-mail or facsimile transmission by directors, officers and employees of Peapack-Gladstone and its subsidiaries or Laurel Hill Advisory Group LLC, a proxy solicitor firm. Directors, officers and employees will not be compensated for such solicitation activities. Peapack-Gladstone will pay $6,000 plus certain out of pocket costs to Laurel Hill Advisory Group LLC for its proxy solicitation services. Peapack-Gladstone will also make arrangements with brokers, dealers, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons, and Peapack-Gladstone will reimburse them for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding the materials.

Annual Meeting Attendance

Only shareholders or their proxy holders and Peapack-Gladstone guests may attend the annual meeting. Please bring your E-Proxy Notice to be admitted to the meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name,” you must bring to the meeting evidence of your stock ownership indicating that you beneficially owned the shares on the record date for voting and a valid form of photo identification to be allowed access. If you wish to vote at the meeting, you much bring a proxy executed in your favor from the holder of record.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General and Corporate Governance Principles

The business and affairs of Peapack-Gladstone are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. Members of the Board are kept informed of Peapack-Gladstone’s business through discussions with our President and CEO and Peapack-Gladstone’s other officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees. All members of the Board also served as directors of Peapack-Gladstone’s subsidiary bank, Peapack-Gladstone Bank (the “Bank”), during 2017. The Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone and Peapack-Gladstone Bank each held 13 meetings during 2017. During 2017, each director of Peapack-Gladstone attended no fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of Peapack-Gladstone’s Board and meetings of committees on which such director served. It is Peapack-Gladstone’s policy to encourage director attendance at the Annual Meeting absent a compelling reason such as illness. Last year, all but two directors attended the Annual Meeting.

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Principles, which are intended to provide guidelines for the governance of Peapack-Gladstone, including: the qualification and selection of the Board of Directors and its committees; convening executive sessions of independent directors; the Board of Directors’ interaction with management and third parties; director compensation, orientation and continuing education and the evaluation of the performance of the CEO. The Corporate Governance Principles are available in the Government Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of Peapack-Gladstone’s website located at www.pgbank.com..www.pgbank.com. We periodically review these governance principles, the rules and listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) and SEC regulations.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors is comprised of 13 directors, all of whom are independent directors under applicable NASDAQ rules, except for Douglas L. Kennedy, our Chief Executive Officer. The Company maintains a Risk Committee, which, along with our Board of Directors, is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management. Our full Board receives and reviews a company-wide risk assessment annually. While the Board Risk Committee and the full Board oversee the Company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is an appropriate approach for addressing the risks facing our Company. Our independent directors conduct separate executive sessions to discuss Company affairs on at least a semi-annual basis and more frequently as necessary. The Chair of the Board, who is independent, presides over these sessions. If in the future our Board Chair is not independent, our bylaws provide for the appointment of an independent lead director.

We believe that having a separate Chair and CEO, independent chairs and membership for each of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees and holding executive sessions of independent directors provides the right form of leadership for our Company. Separating the Chair and CEO positions allows us the CEO to better focus on his responsibilities of running the Company, enhancing shareholder growth and better positioning the Company for future

growth, while our experienced independent director majority provides oversight of Company operations and provides different perspectives based on the directors’ experience, oversight and expertise from outside our Company.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that a majority of the directors and all current members of the Nominating, Compensation, and Audit Committees are “independent” in accordance with NASDAQ rules and Peapack-Gladstone’s internal independence standards provided in our Corporate Governance Principles. The Board has determined that the members of the Audit Committee are also “independent” for purposes of the heightened standards of independence under NASDAQ rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the members of the Compensation Committee are also “independent” for purposes of the heightened standard of independence under the NASDAQ rules. The Board’s conclusion follows a review by the Nominating Committee and management of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment history, transactions with the Bank, affiliations and family and other relationships.

To assist it in making determinations of independence, the Board has concluded that the following relationships are immaterial and that a director whose only relationships with Peapack-Gladstone fall within these categories is independent absent any other relationship that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director:

The following categories or types of transactions, relationships or arrangements were considered by the Board in determining that each listed director is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ rules and Peapack-Gladstone’s Corporate Governance Principles.

___________________

Mr. Smith’s sister in-law Anne Smith was promoted to Senior Managing Director in 2017. Anne Smith is not an executive officer of the Company.

Shareholder Communication with Directors

The Board of Directors has established the following procedures for shareholder communications with the Board of Directors:

The Board of Directors has also established the following procedures for shareholder communications with the Chair, who presides over the independent director sessions:

Committees of the Board of Directors

In 2017, the Board of Directors maintained an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating Committee, a Risk Committee, and an Executive Committee. The following table identifies the Company’s Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees and their members as of March 16,15, 2018. Each committee operates under a written charter that is approved by the Board of Directors that governs its composition, responsibilities and operations. Each committee reviews and reassesses the adequacy of its charter at least annually. The charters of all three committees are available in the Governance Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of the Company’s web site (www.pgbank.com).

_____________

*Chairperson

Audit Committee

The Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, Mr. Consi, meets the NASDAQ standard of being financially sophisticated. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Consi meets the SEC criteria of an “audit committee financial expert.”

The charter provides the Audit Committee the authority and responsibility for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of our independent auditors, including pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors. Other responsibilities of the Audit Committee include: reviewing the scope and results of the audit with our independent auditors; reviewing with management and our independent auditors Peapack-Gladstone’s interim and year-end operating results including earnings releases; considering the appropriateness of the internal accounting and auditing procedures of Peapack-Gladstone; considering our outside auditors’ independence; reviewing examination reports by bank regulatory agencies; reviewing audit reports prepared by the Internal Audit Department of Peapack-Gladstone; reviewing audit reports prepared by any outside firm that may conduct internal audit functions for Peapack-Gladstone; and reviewing the response of management to those reports. The Audit Committee reports to the full Board pertinent matters coming before it.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee recommends to the independent members of the Board the CEO’s compensation, sets specific compensation for executive officers (other than the CEO) and ratifies general compensation levels for all other officers and employees. It also administers our long-term stock incentive plans and makes awards under those plans. The Compensation Committee also recommends Board compensation. In setting compensation levels, the Compensation Committee undertakes a thorough analysis and consideration of overall Company performance, individual job performance, the overall need of the Company to attract, retain and incent executive talent, the total cost of the compensation programs, and peer compensation comparison.comparisons.

The Compensation Committee has the authority to and responsibility for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of compensation consulting and advisory firms as it deems appropriate to its role. In 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of McLagan, an Aon Hewitt Company (“McLagan”), an independent compensation consulting firm specializing in executive compensation, which provided an updated competitive market analysis. McLagan reports directly to the Compensation Committee and carries out its responsibilities to the Compensation Committee in coordination with the Human Resources Department as requested by the Compensation Committee.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee reviews qualifications of and recommends to the Board candidates for election as director of Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank, considers the composition of the Board, recommends committee assignments, and discusses management succession for the Chair and the CEO positions. The Nominating Committee is also charged with reviewing the Board’s adherence to the Corporate Governance Principles and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Nominating Committee reviews recommendations from shareholders regarding corporate governance and director candidates. The procedure for submitting recommendations of director candidates is set forth below under the caption “Nomination of Directors.”

Nomination of Directors

Nominations for director may be made only by the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board or by a shareholder of record entitled to vote. The Board of Directors has established minimum criteria for members of the Board, which include:

The Nominating Committee considers diversity of experience, both of the individual under consideration and of the Board as a whole, as a factor in identifying nominees for director. In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, in assessing candidates for nomination, the Nominating Committee considers, among other factors, the candidate’s independence, diversity, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board.

The Nominating Committee has adopted a policy regarding consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to submit a director candidate for consideration by the Committee must submit such director candidate recommendations to the Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, NJ 07921, in writing, not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting. For our annual meeting in 2019, we must receive this notice between December 10, 2018 and January 9, 2019. To ensure that a shareholder wishing to propose a candidate for consideration by the Committee has a significant stake in the Company, to qualify for consideration by the Committee, the shareholder submitting the candidate must demonstrate that he or she has been the beneficial owner of at least 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares for a minimum of one year prior to the submission of the request. In addition, the Committee has the right to require any additional background or other information from any director candidate or the recommending shareholder as it may deem appropriate. Shareholders who wish

to nominate a director must follow the requirements in our bylaws. For information regarding shareholder nominations of director candidates, see “Shareholder Proposals” below.

You can obtain a copy of our policy regarding shareholder recommendations for director candidates by writing to Todd M. Poland, Corporate Secretary, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation, 500 Hills Drive, Suite 300, P.O. Box 700, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921.

Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy

Peapack-Gladstone has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy, which applies to all of Peapack-Gladstone’s directors, officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy is available in the Government Documents portion of the Investor Relations section of Peapack-Gladstone’s website located at www.pgbank.com. Peapack-Gladstone will disclose any substantive amendments to or waiver from provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy on our website as may be required and within the time period specified under applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes the compensation of the non-employee directors of Peapack-Gladstone in 2017. Douglas L. Kennedy, as a full-time employee, was not compensated for his service rendered as a director.

The following table represents the number of restricted shares awarded to each director during 2017, the grant date fair market value of these awards computed in accordance with ASC 718 and the aggregate number of options or restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2017, for each of the following directors.

(a)       Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 12 – Stock-Based Compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for additional information on the valuation methodology.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth as of March 16,15, 2018 certain information as to beneficial ownership of each person known to Peapack-Gladstone to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding common stock of Peapack-Gladstone.

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth as of March 16,15, 2018 the number of shares of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock, beneficially owned by each of the directors/nominees and the executive officers of Peapack-Gladstone for whom individual information is required to be set forth in this proxy statement (the “named executive officers”) pursuant to the regulations of the SEC, and by all directors and executive officers as a group.

NOTES:

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2017, the Board of Directors updated the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Stock Ownership Guidelines apply to the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and the named executive officers of the Company and impose the following requirements:

Individuals can count shares owned in a Company benefit plan towards the stock ownership requirement. There is no set compliance period to meet the guidelines, with the exception of the minimum ownership requirement applicable to new Board members, which must be met at the time of a new Board member’s appointment. However, until the guidelines are achieved, individuals will be required to retain 100% of any net shares received through a Company grant under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has 13 members. Peapack-Gladstone’s Nominating Committee has recommended to the Board that the 13 current directors be re-elected for one-year terms expiring at Peapack-Gladstone’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. If, for any reason, any of the nominees become unavailable for election, the proxy solicited by the Board may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the Board. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the named nominees is unavailable for election or will not serve if elected.

Unless a shareholder indicates otherwise on the proxy, the proxy will be voted for the persons named in the table below to serve until the expiration of their terms, and thereafter until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the Board’s nominees for election, the nominees’ positions with Peapack-Gladstone (if any), the principal occupation or employment of each nominee for the past five years and the period during which each nominee has served as a director of Peapack-Gladstone. The nominee’s prior service as a director includes prior service as a director of the Bank prior to the formation of the holding company. In addition, described below is each director nominee’s particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that have led the Board to conclude that the person should serve as a director.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

The members of our Board of Directors collectively demonstrate appropriate leadership skills, experience and judgment in areas that are relevant to our business. We believe that their collective ability to challenge and stimulate management and their dedication to the affairs of the Company serve the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE

DIRECTORS INCLUDED IN PROPOSAL 1.

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive, are focused on pay-for-performance principles and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We also believe that both the Company and our shareholders benefit from responsive corporate governance policies and constructive and consistent dialogue. The proposal described below, commonly known as a “Say on Pay” proposal, gives you, as a shareholder of Peapack-Gladstone the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation for our named executive officers.

As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), shareholders were provided an opportunity to approve on an advisory, or non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. Accordingly, we are asking you to vote on the compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation (together with the accompanying narrative disclosure) in this proxy statement. Your vote is advisory and will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The following summarizes the backgrounds of the named executive officers.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE NON-BINDING APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

PROPOSAL 3

AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders approve an amendment to Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company that would increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 (as presently authorized) to 42,000,000 shares. The Board of Directors unanimously voted to approve this amendment and to recommend that shareholders approve it.

As of March 16,15, 2018, 18,946,56419,013,821 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, and 408,178 shares of common stock were held as treasury shares. In addition, approximately 897,797847,804 shares are subject to restricted and performance stock awards. As a result, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance, after taking into account shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s employee stock plans, is 677,326.732,808.

The Board believes that the availability of additional authorized shares of common stock will provide the Company with additional flexibility to issue common stock for a variety of general corporate purposes as the Board may determine to

be desirable including, without limitation, stock splits (including splits effected through the declaration of stock dividends), raising capital, future financings, investment opportunities, acquisitions, or other distributions. The Board has not authorized the Company to take any action with respect to the shares that would be authorized under this proposal, and the Company currently does not have any definitive plans, arrangements or understandings with respect to the issuance of the additional shares of common stock authorized by the proposed amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.

The proposed amendment to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect or delay or prevent a change in control of the Company by providing the Company the capability to engage in actions that would be dilutive to a potential acquiror, to pursue alternative transactions, or to otherwise increase the potential cost to acquire control of the Company. Thus, while the Company currently has no intent to employ the additional unissued authorized shares as an anti-takeover device, the proposed amendment and the future issuance of additional shares of common stock may have the effect of discouraging future unsolicited takeover attempts. The Board is not aware of any such attempt to take control of the Company, and would act in the best interest of shareholders if any attempt was made. The proposed amendment has been prompted by business and financial considerations. The proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock will not change the number of shares of common stock outstanding, nor will it have any immediate dilutive effect or change the rights of current holders of the Company’s common stock. However, the issuance of additional shares of common stock authorized by this amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation may occur at times or under circumstances as to have a dilutive effect on earnings per share, book value per share or the percentage voting or ownership interest of the present holders of the Company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive rights under the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to subscribe for additional securities that the Company may issue.

Once the proposed amendment is approved, no further action by the shareholders would be necessary prior to the issuance of additional shares of common stock unless required by law or the rules of any stock exchange or national securities association on which the common stock is then listed or quoted. Under the proposed amendment, each of the newly authorized shares of common stock will have the same rights and privileges as currently authorized common stock. Adoption of the proposed amendment will not affect the rights of the holders of currently outstanding common stock of the Company nor will it change the par value of the common stock. The proposed amendment to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock does not change the number of shares of preferred stock that the Company is authorized to issue. The last increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock was approved by the shareholders in 2009.

If the proposed amendment is adopted, it will become effective upon filing of Articles of Amendment to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the New Jersey Secretary of State.

The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast on this proposal is required to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL TO AMEND THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES.

PROPOSAL 4

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed Crowe Horwath LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Representatives from Crowe Horwath LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting to answer questions and they will have the opportunity to speak if desired. The Audit Committee will consider the outcome of our shareholders’ vote in connection with the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP, but is not bound by the vote. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether a different independent registered public accounting firm should be selected.

Aggregate fees for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 billed by Crowe Horwath LLP were as follows:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE HORWATH AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Procedures

The Audit Committee maintains a policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to Peapack-Gladstone. The policy requires that all services to be performed by Peapack-Gladstone’s independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services, audit-related services and permitted non-audit services, be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specific services being provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are regularly reviewed in accordance with the pre-approval policy. At subsequent Audit Committee meetings, the Audit Committee receives updates on the services actually provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and management may present additional services for approval. All services rendered by Crowe Horwath LLP are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. Each new engagement of Crowe Horwath LLP in 2017 was approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

To the Board of Directors of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation:

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

We have discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and have discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. In concluding that the independent registered public accounting firm is independent, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors, whether the non-audit services provided by the firm were compatible with its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Audit Committee
of the Board oF Directors

Anthony J. Consi, II, Chair

Richard Daingerfield

Edward A. Gramigna, Jr.

  Steven A. Kass

James R. Lamb, Esq.

  Beth Welsh

March 15, 2018

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following is a discussion and analysis of our compensation programs as they apply to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the other individuals who were serving as executive officers at the end of 2017, and one highly compensated former executive officer (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

Executive Summary

2017 Financial Highlights and Company Performance

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) believes that the Company, under the leadership and guidance of its CEO and other named executive officers, has been successful in executing its Strategic Plan – “Expanding Our Reach.”

In particular, the Committee noted the following factors, which it believes demonstrated the success of the Company and of the CEO and other named executive officers individually in 2017:

2017 Executive Performance Plan Results

For 2017, overall results were better than our budget/plan for 2017 (“2017 Budget”) as shown in the table below.

For purposes of the Company’s Executive Performance Plan (the “EPP”), Company performance was measured as follows:

2017 Budget achievement is based on pretax income and net income.

After consideration of 2017’s results to budget, we considered Company’s performance to be rated at the maximum level under the Executive Performance Plan.

Compensation Philosophy and Program Objectives

The fundamental objective of the Company’s executive compensation program, the elements of which are summarized in the table below, is to fairly compensate our named executive officers at levels appropriate in our market and grant equity compensation to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders. Our compensation program is designed to retain and attract qualified executives and motivate such executives to achieve short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals that strengthen our franchise value and ultimately deliver shareholder value. We believe in a pay-for-performance philosophy that appropriately aligns our executives’ total compensation with the performance and value of their contributions and the Company’s ultimate success.

Change in Future Equity Compensation Structure

For 2018, the Committee adopted a new Long-Term Incentive Plan intended to further interlace executive pay with Company performance. The new LTIP combines the dual LTI and SPA grants into one program that is separated into a performance-vested grant and a time-vested grant, with such awards related to the LTIP made under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The performance-vested portion of the LTIP is granted, with the final number of shares cliff vesting three years later based on a three-year performance period. The time-vested shares are granted based upon prior-year performance and vest equally over a three-year period. For the CEO, CFO and President of Private Wealth Management, half of the LTI grants will be performance based.

2017 CEO Compensation Decisions

Mr. Kennedy joined the Company in October 2012 at a base salary of $500,000. He did not receive a base salary increase in 2013, 2014, 2015 or 2016. Mr. Kennedy received a salary increase of 100,000 in 2017 bringing his base salary to $600,000.

Mr. Kennedy received a short-term incentive award (cash) under the EPP of $540,000 for 2017. This award was based on 2017 Company performance (75% weighting) and 2017 individual performance (25% weighting). As described above, Company performance for 2017 was achieved at the maximum level. Individual performance for 2017 was also rated at the maximum level. The following includes the significant objectives considered in determining Mr. Kennedy’s individual performance, all of which were met or exceeded: continue to expand our wealth business; continue to expand our C&I lending business; continue to enhance the client experience; continue to drive risk management excellence; continue migration to a private banking model; continue to focus on expanding fee based revenue; continue to enhance communications with shareholders; deliver financial results.

In March 2017, Mr. Kennedy was granted a long-term incentive award (restricted stock) under the EPP of $449,997 and a transition award of $99,986, respectively. The EPP award was based on 2016 Company performance (75% weighting) and 2016 individual performance (25% weighting). Company performance for 2016 was set at the maximum level as described in the 2017 Proxy. Individual performance for 2016 was set at the maximum level, as also described in the 2017 Proxy. See the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “2016 Financial Highlights and Company Performance” and “2016 CEO Compensation Decisions” included in our proxy statement filed on March 17, 2017 for information regarding Company and individual performance for 2016. The $449,997 grant vests in equal increments over three years and the $99,986 grant vests in equal increments over five years.

Summary of Key Compensation Compliance Policies

Roles and Decision Process

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing policies governing annual and long-term compensation programs for our executives, and for determining executive compensation levels in line with our philosophy. Details of the Committee’s functions are more fully described in its charter, which has been approved by the Board of Directors and is available on our website. The Chair of the Committee regularly reports on Committee actions at the Company’s Board of Directors meetings.

The Committee reviews all compensation components for the Company’s CEO and other named executive officers, including base salary, annual cash and equity incentives, benefits and contracts/arrangements.

Although the Committee makes independent determinations on all matters related to compensation of the named executive officers, certain members of management may be requested to attend or provide input to the Committee. The CEO provides advice to the Committee relative to the compensation of the other named executive officers. The CEO is not present for the discussion by the Committee of his compensation. Other senior officers, such as the Head of Human Capital, General Counsel, and/or the CFO may provide information and perspective to the Committee as appropriate and/or as requested. The Committee’s independent compensation consultant (McLagan) also provides benchmarking information and advice as appropriate. The Committee makes all of its determinations based on its holistic assessment of the Company’s performance and individual performance and on data provided by management and its independent compensation consultant.

The Committee has the sole authority to retain, terminate, obtain advice from, oversee and compensate its outside advisors, including its independent compensation consultant. The Committee has determined that it has the funding it needs to retain the advisors necessary to carry out its duties effectively. In 2013, the Committee first retained McLagan as an independent outside compensation consultant. McLagan was retained again for 2017. McLagan’s services included peer group development and market benchmarking studies, assisting with the design and subsequent review of the incentive program, and providing insight and best practices with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers as well as the implementation of employment agreements and change in control agreements.

While the Committee seeks independent external perspective, the Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers.

The Committee reviewed its relationship with McLagan and considered McLagan’s independence in light of all relevant factors, including those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and under the applicable NASDAQ listing rules. The Compensation Committee received a report from McLagan addressing its independence, including the following factors: (1) there were no services provided to the Company, other than compensation related to consulting services provided by McLagan; (2) fees paid by the Company as a percentage of Aon’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by McLagan that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the senior advisors and a member of the Compensation Committee; (5) any Company stock owned by the senior advisors; and (6) any business or personal relationships between the executives and the senior advisors. The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work performed by McLagan and McLagan’s senior advisors involved in the engagements did not raise any conflict of interest.

Compensation Review

Understanding the competitive landscape is a key element the Committee considers in making compensation decisions. Each year, the Committee commissions a compensation review by its independent compensation consultant. The purpose of this review is to provide an independent and objective analysis of our total compensation relative to a peer group and industry practices. The Committee utilizes the benchmarking data and best practices information for ongoing monitoring of executive pay relative to market practices and to determine executive compensation.

The foundation for the review is data from a peer group of banks. In late 2016, the Committee reviewed benchmarking information provided by McLagan that the Committee used to set 2017 compensation. The peer group for this study was selected by the Committee after considering recommendations from McLagan. The peer group used for executive compensation comparisons consisted of 16 commercial banks. The selection criteria generally included: eastern U.S. commercial banks in metro areas with total revenue between $70 million and $240 million, non-interest income to total revenue greater than 12.5% or trust and investment revenue greater than $2 million; and nonperforming assets to total assets less than or equal to 2%. This peer group of 16 banks had median total assets of $4.0 billion (comparable to the Company’s $3.8 billion at December 31, 2016), and median revenue of $123 million (comparable to the Company’s $125 million for 2016).

The peer group consisted of the following 16 banks:

The following salary and estimated total compensation (at target) comparisons were considered by the Committee in determining salaries and total compensation for the named executive officers:

Say on Pay Consideration

The Committee also considers feedback from our shareholders in making compensation determinations. At the 2017 Annual Meeting, over 89% of votes cast were in favor of the say-on-pay proposal. We view this as a positive endorsement of pay practice. Notwithstanding this strong support, we continue to monitor our pay alignment and seek ways to improve our compensation program. As a result, the Committee has decided to restructure the long-term incentive plan for 2018 and beyond. More detail on the specifics of that plan can be found in the Executive Performance Plans section below.

Elements of Compensation and Decisions

We target our total compensation in a way that is fair and appropriate considering market conditions, peer group comparisons, Company performance, individual performance, as well as our long-term strategic goals. We believe our compensation policies and practices appropriately balance risk against our desire to award competitive compensation and are unlikely to have an adverse effect on our Company. The elements of our compensation include base salary and short-term incentive awards, long-term incentive awards and long-term strategic plan awards under our EPP as highlighted below.

Base Salary

Our named executive officers’ base salaries are set to reflect a combination of factors, including but not limited to, level of responsibility, being competitive in the market, experience, skill-set, and individual performance, as well as the Company’s compensation philosophy and overall performance. We design our base salaries in significant part to retain and attract talented executives who can help drive long-term shareholder value. We believe we must keep our base salaries competitive, within the context of our conservative compensation culture, or risk losing executive talent because the markets in which we operate present current and potential executives with higher-paying alternatives.

The following summarizes the 2016 and 2017 salaries for the Company’s named executive officers:

For purposes of the CD&A he is shown as COO throughout the CD&A section.

Executive Performance Plans

For 2017 compensation, the Committee continued the EPP, which was put in place in 2013. The EPP consisted of the following three components, as previously described:

The amount of STI Awards, LTI Awards and SPA Grants earned by each named executive officer is dependent on the achievement of both Company goals and individual goals. The following chart depicts the potential for awards granted to each named executive officer under the EPP. The percentages referenced in the chart with respect to the STI Awards (Cash), LTI Awards (Restricted Stock) and the SPA Grants (Restricted Stock) refer to percentages of base salary. The SPA Grants in 2013 for the CEO, CFO and COO (at that time) and, in 2014 for the President of Private Wealth Management were one-time, intended to cover multiple periods of up to and including the year ended December 31, 2017, as discussed later in this document under “SPA Grants.” The EVP, Chief Credit Officer is eligible to receive an annual SPA Grant, in the set percentage noted below; such grant vests equally over a five-year period.

In formulating the EPP, the Committee also considered internal policies and relevant guidance from bank regulatory authorities that direct the Committee to ensure that compensation incentive programs do not jeopardize the safety and soundness of the Company or the Bank. To that end, the Committee believes that the EPP and the Company’s other incentive compensation policies:

While the Committee adopted the EPP in 2013, it uses the EPP as a general guideline and is not required to award compensation based strictly on the terms of the EPP. Accordingly, the Committee has the absolute discretion to make awards that are less than or greater than awards contemplated by the EPP. The Committee also may change, modify or discontinue the EPP at any time, including during the course of a particular year. The Committee may take into account the following factors:

In 2017, the Committee approved an amended long-term portion of the EPP, to take effect in 2018. The new LTI plan will be split between performance-vested and time-vested shares. The time-vested portion of the plan provides annual restricted stock awards, with three-year ratable vesting, with the grant based on the discretion of the Committee (between approximately 55% - 165% of the predefined target level). The Committee will consider the prior year’s performance of the Company and the prior year’s performance of the individual among other things. The performance-vested shares will be granted based on the discretion of the Committee (between approximately 55% - 165% of the predefined target level), and will vest at the conclusion of a three-year performance period based on EPS growth relative to peers. This grant is intended to motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals and to further align Company executives with shareholders.

Due to the nature of this plan change, no equity under the EPP was granted for the CEO and SEVPs for performance in 2017. The awards made in 2017 were granted based upon 2016 performance, while the 2018 award will be granted based on 2018-2020 performance. In an effort to keep executives aligned with Company performance throughout this 2017 transition year, the Committee granted a transition award to executives in 2017, which vests ratably over five years.

EPP Company Performance

The following table shows the income targets at various levels compared to the actual performance of the Company and the corresponding Company performance achievement as it relates to payouts for the annual STI (cash) awards in the EPP.

After reviewing these measures, the Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at the maximum level for 2017, as calculated.

Short Term Incentive Awards (Cash)

We paid short term incentive awards (cash) to our named executive officers based on 2017 Company performance and 2017 individual performance. As described previously, Company performance for 2017 was rated at the maximum level. Individual 2017 performance was rated at the maximum level for the CEO and at maximum for each of the other four named executive officers that received an award. The individual performance of those other four named executive officers was determined by the CEO and agreed to by the Compensation Committee. Among other things, the CEO considered performance relative to: specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in the budget, wherever applicable; specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in prior year results, wherever applicable; and various goals and targets previously set by the CEO and the individual at the beginning of the fiscal year, including personal accountability for critical performance with respect to standard banking industry company metrics, such as deposit growth, loan growth, credit quality, efficiency ratio, and other such goals. The use of individual goals represents the clear assignment by the Compensation Committee of direct personal accountability for specific financial, organizational, operational and risk management objectives, the attainment of which contribute significantly to the Company’s performance. The Committee awarded the short-term incentives (cash) detailed below.

Long Term Incentive Awards (Restricted Stock)

Our long-term incentive awards (generally restricted stock units) are designed to focus our executives on long-term performance and shareholder value. We granted long term incentive awards (generally restricted stock units) to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Caspersen, Babcock, and Ms. Chalkan in March 2017. These awards were based on 2016 Company performance and 2016 individual performance. Company performance for 2016 was at the maximum level. Individual performance was rated at the maximum level for the CEO and at maximum or target level for the other named executive officers for 2016. The individual performance of those other four named executive officers was determined by the CEO and agreed to by the Compensation Committee. Among other things, the CEO considered performance relative to: specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in the budget, wherever applicable; specifics relative to each individual’s responsibilities as included in prior year results, wherever applicable; and various goals and targets previously set by the CEO and the individual at the beginning of the fiscal year, including personal accountability for critical performance with respect to standard banking industry company metrics, such as deposit growth, loan growth, credit quality, efficiency ratio, and other such goals. The use of individual goals represents the clear assignment by the Compensation Committee of direct personal accountability for specific financial, organizational, operational and risk management objectives, the attainment of which contribute significantly to the Company’s performance. See the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “2016 Financial Highlights and Company Performance” and “2016 CEO Compensation Decisions” included in our proxy statement filed on March 17, 2017 for information regarding Company and individual performance for 2016. This grant vests in equal increments over three years.

The following table shows the income targets at various levels compared to the actual 2016 performance of the Company and the corresponding Company performance achievement as it relates to payouts for the annual LTI (restricted stock) awards.

After reviewing these measures, the Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at the maximum level for 2017, as calculated. The Committee concluded Company performance was achieved at maximum for 2016, as calculated. The following table sets forth the awards of restricted stock granted in March 2017 based on 2016 performance to our named executive officers.

SPA Grants

As described previously, SPA grants of restricted stock have been intended to motivate executives to focus on the achievement of the Company’s high performing long-term strategic planning goals. For the CEO, CFO, and President of Private Wealth Management the grant was not an annual grant and was expected to cover multiple years up to and including the year ended December 31, 2017. The CEO and CFO received these grants in 2013. The President of Private Wealth Management received his grant in 2014 when he joined the Company. These SPA grants were subject to vesting as follows: 50% of the grant vests in equal increments over a five-year period and the remaining 50% would have vested only if four of

five pre-determined high performing annual targets were met for an annual period of time, by year end 2017. Since four of the five targets were not met, this portion of the grant will be forfeited. The high performing targets were as follows:

While we attained the revenue growth target, EPS growth target, and nonperforming asset target, we did not generate a one percent ROAA or a 12 percent ROAE in 2017, thus only attaining three of the five high performance targets (as opposed to the four required for performance-based vesting). In December 2015, we reversed the accumulated restricted stock expense that had been amortized since grant date, and have not accrued any expense since.

As noted in the table above, the EVP, Chief Credit Officer received an annual SPA grant in March 2017 with a value of 20 percent of her base salary. Such grant time vests equally over a five-year period.

Transition Grants

As described earlier, the CEO and SEVPs received a transitional award at the beginning of 2017 which represents 1/6^th of the 2018 LTI plan target opportunity. These shares vest over five years.

Deferred Compensation Retention Award

In 2017, Peapack instituted a retention tool for the top three executives (Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Carfora and Mr. Babcock). The Deferred Compensation Retention Award (“DCRA”) is a cash-based retention award with contributions made to the plan over a five-year period. Beginning with the third quarter of 2017, quarterly contributions of $50,000 for Mr. Kennedy and $25,000 for the other two executives will be made assuming the executive is employed and the Company has generated EPS of at least 60% of budget for the previous 12 months. Vesting occurs ratably over three years. The account balance receives interest crediting based on the Wall Street Journal prime rate, provided that the rate shall not exceed 7.5%.

The Committee determined a retention award based in cash instead of stock was appropriate because of the substantial stock ownership of the top executives. The current equity ownership of these executives is well in excess of the Company’s ownership guidelines.

Benefits/Other Compensation

The Company provides bank-sponsored insurance and retirement benefit plans for our named executive officers. The benefit packages are designed to assist named executive officers in providing for their financial security.

The Company provides retirement benefits to named executive officers through a combination of plans that are qualified and nonqualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company has established a qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code, covering substantially all salaried employees over the age of 21 with at least twelve months of service and whose participation is not prohibited by the 401(k) Plan. Under the savings portion of the 401(k) Plan, employees may contribute up to 15% of their base pay (up to a maximum of $18,000 in 2017). Annually, the Company makes a matching contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% of an employee’s salary, plus up to an additional 3% employer contribution for all employees, on a discretionary basis. The Committee believes that employees require 401(k) plans, and that to attract and retain able employees the Company must offer these benefits to its employees, including its named executive officers.

The named executive officers receive the same employer-provided health and welfare insurance available to all full-time employees, which includes health, dental, vision, disability and basic group life insurance.

The Company has also purchased bank owned life insurance and entered into a split-dollar plan with the named executive officers and certain other employees to provide current and post-employment life insurance in an amount that ranges from $25,000 to 2.5 times the participant’s annual base salary. A life insurance benefit of 2.5 times a named executive officer’s annual base salary vests if prior to the termination of employment there is a change in control or the named executive officer becomes disabled. A benefit of 2.5 times the named executive officer’s salary is paid if the participant dies while employed by the Company. Named executive officers are also entitled to a vested post-employment life insurance benefit based on years of service and age as of the date of termination of employment. This vested benefit ranges from a minimum of 1.0 times base annual salary at age 50 to a maximum of 2.5 times annual base salary at age 60, in each case after completion of 15 years of service. There is a minimum benefit of $25,000 if the participant does not reach the vesting levels. Bank-owned life insurance assists the Company in offsetting the rising costs of employee benefits by providing the Company with current income prior to the death of an insured, and a lump-sum payment upon the death of an insured. The Company owns the cash surrender value of the policies and records the increases in the cash surrender value as income. Upon the death of an insured the Company will receive cash equal to the cash surrender value of the policy and excess life insurance over the amount paid to the insured’s beneficiary. The Committee believes that bank-owned life insurance is primarily a good investment for the Company, and secondarily a supplementary life insurance benefit for many of our officers, including our named executive officers.

Change in Control Agreements

We maintain individual change in control agreements with Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Carfora, Mr. Plante, Mr. Babcock and Ms. Chalkan. The agreements each provide for the employment of the named executive officer for a Contract Period (defined in the table below) commencing on the day prior to a change in control (as defined in the agreement). During the Contract

Period, the executives will each be provided with (1) the same base salary that existed prior to the change in control, (2) an opportunity for a bonus equal to at least the bonus opportunity in effect immediately prior to the change in control, and (3) benefits and perquisites at levels generally available to the executive prior to the change in control. If, during the Contract Period, the executive resigns for good reason (as defined in the agreement) or is terminated other than for cause (as defined in the agreement) he/she will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to the multiple defined in the table below times his/her then base salary and the greater of his/her average bonus amount for the three preceding fiscal years and the bonus paid during the most recent fiscal year. Each named executive officer will also be entitled to receive payments from the Company equal to the costs of continuation of health insurance coverage for a period defined in the table below following termination of employment. In the event that the total benefits payable under the agreements and other arrangements following a change in control would require the executive to pay an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, then the total payments paid to the executive will be the greater of (1) a reduced payment equal to the amount that would not result in the payment of an excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and an excise tax by the executive under Section 4999, and (2) a payment equal to the greatest after tax amount payable to the executive after taking into account any excise tax imposed under Section 4999. The agreements also prohibit the executives from competing against the Company and soliciting the Company’s customers and employees for a one-year period following termination of employment. The Committee feels these agreements are necessary to encourage our named executive officers to approach an advantageous merger or acquisition transaction without regard to immediate loss of salary and benefits. The Committee also believes that, given the high degree of consolidation within the banking business, these agreements are necessary to retain and attract talented named executive officers.

Employment Contracts

We are also a party to employment agreements that give the named executive officers certain benefits. These agreements provide, among other things, for eligibility for (1) participation during the employment term in all compensation and employee benefits plans for which any salaried employees of the Company are eligible, (2) an annual base salary and (3) bonus payments with respect to each calendar year within the Committee’s discretion. Under these agreements, if a named executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause (at any time preceding the date prior to a change in control), the Company shall pay the executive’s base salary for a period equal to two years from the effective date of such termination. In the event that the Company terminates a named executive officer’s employment for cause or in the event of the named executive officer’s retirement, permanent disability or death, the Company shall pay the named executive officer any earned but unpaid base salary as of the date of termination of employment. The employment agreements also include certain non-compete and non-solicitation provisions. The Committee believes the employment agreements, which are customary in the Company’s competitive market, are important in order to retain and attract talented senior executives.

Separation and Release with Finn M.W. Caspersen, Jr.

Mr. Caspersen’s resigned as Chief Strategy Officer and General Counsel and from the Board of Directors of the Bank and the Company, effective December 30, 2017. In consideration of releasing all claims against the Company and the Bank, the Company will pay Mr. Caspersen severance of $640,000 over a two-year period, paid him a separation payment for 2017 of $176,000, fully vested 19,356 shares of restricted stock, which would have vested over the next several years, and provided other perquisites that were consistent with other executives at his level.

Income Tax Considerations

Our federal income tax deduction for executive compensation paid to our named executive officers listed in the summary compensation table, with the exception of the executive listed as a result of serving as the principal financial officer, is limited by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to $1 million annually. Compensation paid to any of them exceeding $1 million is non-deductible for federal income tax purposes unless it is “qualified performance-based compensation,” as defined in Section 162(m), meaning generally, that the compensation is based on the executive’s achieving pre-established objective performance goals and paid under a plan pre-approved by our shareholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) enacted on December 22, 2017 significantly modified Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Tax Act eliminated the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception to the deductibility limitation under Section 162(m) for tax years commencing after December 31, 2017. The Tax Act provides “grandfathered” treatment for qualified performance-based compensation in excess of $1 million that meets the requirements of Section 162(m), is payable pursuant a written binding contract in effect as of November 2, 2017 and is not modified in any material respect. In addition, the Tax Act expands the definition of “covered employee” to include the principal financial officer as well as any employee who has been designated a covered employee for any fiscal year beginning after December 31, 2016.

In 2017 and in prior years, the Committee monitored the effect of Section 162(m) on the deductibility of the Company’s compensation. The Committee weighed the benefits of full deductibility with the other objectives of the executive compensation program and, accordingly, may have paid compensation subject to the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m). A number of requirements must be met for particular compensation to qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m), so there can be no assurance that the incentive compensation awarded will be fully deductible in all circumstances.

The Committee has historically attempted to structure its compensation arrangements to achieve deductibility under Section 162(m), unless the benefit of such deductibility is considered by the Committee to be outweighed by the need for flexibility or the attainment of other objectives. As was the case prior to the enactment of the Tax Act, the Committee will continue to monitor issues concerning the deductibility of executive compensation. Since corporate objectives may not always be consistent with the requirements for tax deductibility, the Committee is prepared, when it deems appropriate, to enter into compensation arrangements under which payments will not be deductible under Section 162(m). Thus, deductibility will be one of many factors considered by the Committee in designing our executive compensation program.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and based on such review and discussions the Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Peapack-Gladstone’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee

Ofof the Board of Directors

F. Duffield Meyercord, Chair

Anthony J. Consi, II

Tony Spinelli

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2017 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth compensation information for Peapack-Gladstone’s named executive officers. For a summary of the Committee’s decisions on compensation awarded to our named executive officers in 2017, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

(A) This is a defined contribution plan with annual contributions to be made of $200,000 for Mr. Kennedy and $100,000 for Messrs. Carfora and Babcock for a period of five years. All contributions are to be made in cash. The effective date of the Plan was August 2017. The account balance receives interest based on the Wall Street Journal prime rate.

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following tables set forth additional detail regarding 2017 incentive compensation non-equity (cash) and stock award grants under the Executive Performance Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

The following table represents stock awards outstanding for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2017. The market value of shares that have not vested is calculated using our closing market price of $35.02 as of December 29, 2017. There were no outstanding options for any of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table represents the vesting of restricted stock during 2017. There were no stock options exercised by any named executive officers in 2017.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information:

For fiscal 2017, our last completed fiscal year:

Based on this information, the ratio for 2017 of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is 29 to 1.

We completed the following steps to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees and to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and CEO:

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank have entered into employment agreements with the named executive officers, which set forth the terms of employment of the officers and provide for benefits in the event of termination without “cause.” Peapack-Gladstone and the Bank have also entered into change in control agreements with the named executive officers, each of which provide for benefits in the event a termination without “cause” or for “good reason” during a specified period following a merger or acquisition of Peapack-Gladstone. A detailed description of the employment agreements and change-in-control agreements may be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy under “Employment Contracts” and “Change in Control Agreements.”

The following table shows the potential payments under each named executive officer’s change-in-control or employment agreement if he or she had terminated employment with the Company effective December 31, 2017, under each of the following retirement or termination circumstances: (1) death or disability; (2) voluntary resignation or dismissal for cause; (3) retirement; (4) dismissal without cause; and (5) dismissal without cause or resignation for good reason following a change-in-control of Peapack-Gladstone. These payments are considered estimates as they contain some assumptions regarding stock price, life expectancy, salary and non-incentive compensation amounts and income tax rates and laws.

The following table does not reflect the potential payments to upon termination or change in control to Mr. Caspersen because he resigned from employment with, and from the board of directors of, the Company and the Bank, effective December 30, 2017. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Summary Compensation Table above for further details regarding the amounts payable to Mr. Caspersen in connection with his resignation.

The greatest after-tax amount payable to the executive after taking into account any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code on the total payments to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Plante and Ms. Chalkan is greater than the dollar amount that can be paid to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Plante and Ms. Chalkan, without triggering an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. Accordingly, the payments to Messrs. Kennedy, Carfora, Plante and Ms. Chalkan in connection with a termination following a change in control on December 31, 2017 are not subject to a reduction.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that Peapack-Gladstone’s executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of Peapack-Gladstone’s common stock, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based upon copies of reports furnished by these insiders of Peapack-Gladstone, all Section 16(a) reporting requirements applicable to insiders during 2017 were satisfied on a timely basis except for: one Form 4 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Francesco Rossi, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer; one Form 3 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Robert A. Plante, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer; and one Form 4 (representing one transaction), which was filed late on behalf of Lisa Chalkan, Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Peapack-Gladstone uses the same policies and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of related persons transactions as described above under the caption “Director Independence.” In addition to the matters discussed above under the captions “Director Independence,” directors and officers and their associates were customers of and had transactions with the Bank during the year ended December 31, 2017, and it is expected that such persons will continue to have such transactions in the future. All deposit accounts, loans, and commitments comprising such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business of the Bank on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to Peapack-Gladstone, and, in the opinion of management of Peapack-Gladstone, did not involve more than normal risks of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

New Jersey corporate law requires that the notice of shareholders’ meeting (for either a regular or special meeting) specify the purpose or purposes of such meeting. Thus, any substantive proposals, including shareholder proposals, must be referred to in Peapack-Gladstone’s notice of shareholders’ meeting for such proposal to be properly considered at a meeting of Peapack-Gladstone.

Proposals of shareholders which are eligible under the rules of the SEC to be included in Peapack-Gladstone’s year 2019 proxy materials must be received by the Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone no later than November 27, 2018.

Under the terms of our bylaws, a shareholder who intends to nominate a person for election to our Board or to present an item of business at the 2019 Annual Meeting (other than a proposal submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials) must deliver to the Secretary of Peapack-Gladstone Bank written notice of such business, including the information specified in the bylaws, between January 9, 2019 and February 8, 2019. Such notice must meet the requirements in our bylaws. If Peapack-Gladstone advances its 2019 Annual Meeting date to a date more than 30 days from the anniversary date of its 2018 Annual Meeting or delaydelays it more than 70 days, then notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than 90 days prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the close of business 10 days following the day on which the public announcement of the date of the meeting is made. If Peapack-Gladstone changes the date of its 2019 Annual Meeting in a manner that alters the deadline, Peapack-Gladstone will so state under Item 5 of the first quarterly report on Form 10-Q it files with the SEC after the date change or notify its shareholders by another reasonable means.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than that stated in this proxy statement. Should any other matter properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, it is intended that proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.

.. + Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 9, 2018 Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual shareholders’ meeting are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is important! This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The proxy statement and annual report on Form 10-K are available at: www.envisionreports.com/PGC • Easy Online Access — A Convenient Way to View Proxy Materials and Vote When you go online to view materials, you can also vote your shares. Step 1: Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC to view the materials. Step 2: Click on Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Step 3: Follow the instructions on the screen to log in. Step 4: Make your selection as instructed on each screen to select delivery preferences and vote. When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials. Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials – If you want to receive a copy of these documents, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request for a copy as instructed on the reverse side on or before April 25, 2018 to facilitate timely delivery. 2NOT + 02SQ0B

.. Shareholder Meeting Notice Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Wednesday, May 9, 2018 onthe first floor of the headquarters building at 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New Jersey, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 4: 1. Election of Directors. 2. Advisory vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. 3. Amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000. 4. Ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the meeting, please bring this notice with you. Directions to Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting From points North: From points South: • Take I-287 South to exit 22 toward US 202/US 206 N • Take I-287 North to exit 22A US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Take jughandle on right • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Turn left on US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select a future delivery preference: Paper copies: Current and future paper delivery requests can be submitted via the telephone, Internet or email options below. Email copies: Current and future email delivery requests must be submitted via the Internet following the instructions below. If you request an email copy of current materials you will receive an email with a link to the materials. PLEASE NOTE: You must use the number in the shaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a set of proxy materials. • Internet – Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC. Click Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Follow the instructions to log in and order a copy of the current meeting materials and submit your preference for email or paper delivery of future meeting materials. • Telephone – Call us free of charge at 1-866-641-4276 and follow the instructions to log in and order a paper copy of the materials by mail for the current meeting. You can also submit a preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings. • Email – Send email to investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation” in the subject line. Include in the message your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse, and state in the email that you want a paper copy of current meeting materials. You can also state your preference to receive a paper copy for future meetings. To facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of the proxy materials must be received by April 25, 2018. 02SQ0B

.. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern time, on May 9, 2018. Vote by Internet • Go to www.envisionreports.com/PGC • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone • Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone • Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone • Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X Annual Meeting Proxy Card • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • Proposals — The Board recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. 1. Election of Directors to serve for a one-year term and until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold + 01 - Carmen M. Bowser 02 - Dr. Susan A. Cole 03 - Anthony J. Consi 04 - Richard Daingerfield 05 - Edward A. Gramigna, Jr. 06 - Steven A. Kass 07 - Douglas L. Kennedy 08 - John D. Kissel 09 - James R. Lamb, Esq. 10 - F. Duffield Meyercord 11 - Philip W. Smith, III 12 - Tony Spinelli 13 - Beth Welsh For Against Abstain 2. Advisory vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the 3. Amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 21,000,000 to 42,000,000. Against Abstain For 4. Ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. Note: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Meeting. Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1UPX + 02SPYB

.. Directions to Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s Annual Meeting From points North: From points South: • Take I-287 South to exit 22 toward US 202/US 206 N • Take I-287 North to exit 22A US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Take jughandle on right • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Turn left on US-202/US-206 S toward Pluckemin • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Take the exit toward Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • Turn left onto Hills Drive • Destination will be on the left • IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • + Proxy — Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders 500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, New JerseyProxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – May 9, 2018 John D. Kissel, James R. Lamb and Philip W. Smith, III or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation to be held on May 9, 2018 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2, 3, and 4. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.) Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print your new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. +